You are not logged in | Log in
Return to the list of active seminars

Seminar Games, Mechanisms, and Social Networks

The seminar deals with issues at the intersection of computer science, artificial intelligence and economics. We discuss results of our group members from game theory (cooperative and non-cooperative), social choice theory, mechanism design and social network analysis.

The seminar takes place roughly every 2 weeks. Once a month (usually on the first Thursday of the month), the seminar is held remotely and is connected with AGH.


Organizers

Information

Thursdays, 12:15 p.m. , room: 4050

Home page

https://aiecon.mimuw.edu.pl/research/research-seminar/

Research fields

List of talks

  • April 3, 2025, 12:15 p.m.
    Nidhi Rathi (Max-Planck-Institut für Informatik)
    New Fairness Concepts for Allocating Indivisible Items (New Fairness Concepts for Allocating Indivisible Items)
    We study the fundamental problem of 'fairly' dividing a set of indivisible items among agents with varied valuations/preferences. But what does “fairly” mean? There is no single answer here and different ways of interpreting “fairly” …

  • March 27, 2025, 12:15 p.m.
    Maciej Wojtala (University of Warsaw)
    Attention-based communication for multi-agent reinforcement learning (Attention-based communication for multi-agent reinforcement learning)
    In multi-agent reinforcement learning, problems that attract most research include action-value function decomposition and inter-agent communication. In most studies, these problems are addressed separately. In this paper, we introduce the aggregation of messages from all …

  • March 20, 2025, 12:15 p.m.
    Mikołaj Czarnecki, Michał Korniak (University of Warsaw)
    Indivisible Shapley Value
    We consider the problem of payoff division in indivisible coalitional games, where the value of the grand coalition is a natural number. This number represents a certain quantity of indivisible objects, such as parliamentary seats, …

  • March 13, 2025, noon
    Tomasz Wąs (University of Oxford)
    The Squared Kemeny Rule for Averaging Rankings
    For the problem of aggregating several rankings into one ranking, Kemeny (1959) proposed two methods: the median rule which selects the ranking with the smallest total swap distance to the input rankings, and the mean …

  • Jan. 23, 2025, 12:15 p.m.
    Grzegorz Lisowski (AGH University of Science and Technology)
    Two-Sided Manipulation Games in Stable Matching Markets
    The Deferred Acceptance algorithm is an elegant procedure for finding a stable matching in two-sided matching markets. It ensures that no pair of agents prefers each other to their matched partners. In this work, we …

  • Jan. 16, 2025, noon
    Piotr Faliszewski (AGH University of Science and Technology)
    Learning Real-Life Approval Elections
    We study the independent approval model (IAM) for approval elections, where each candidate has its own approval probability and is approved independently of the other ones. This model generalizes, e.g., the impartial culture, the Hamming …

  • Jan. 8, 2025, 4 p.m.
    Dominik Peters (CNRS, LAMSADE, Université Paris Dauphine - PSL)
    Generalizing Instant Runoff Voting to Allow Indifferences
    Instant Runoff Voting (IRV) is used in elections for many political offices around the world. It allows voters to specify their preferences among candidates as a ranking. We identify a generalization of the rule, called …

  • Dec. 19, 2024, 12:15 p.m.
    Tomasz Wąs (University of Oxford)
    Method of Equal Shares with Bounded Overspending
    In participatory budgeting (PB), voters decide through voting which subset of projects to fund within a given budget. Proportionality in the context of PB is crucial to ensure equal treatment of all groups of voters. …

  • Dec. 12, 2024, noon
    Piotr Kępczyński (University of Warsaw)
    A Characterization of Additive Utility Functions on Indivisible Goods
    We provide an axiomatic characterization of preference relations on indivisible goods that can be represented by additive utility functions. Specifically, we demonstrate that an ordinal preference relation can be represented by some additive utility function …

  • Nov. 28, 2024, 12:15 p.m.
    Marcin Dziubiński (University of Warsaw)
    General Lotto solvable cases of the Colonel Blotto game
    We derive new equilibrium strategies for the discrete Colonel Blotto game for all the numbers of resources and battlefields for which the game can be solved using the discrete General Lotto game of [Hart, 2008]. …

  • Nov. 7, 2024, noon
    Krzysztof Sornat (AGH University of Science and Technology)
    An O(loglog n)-Approximation for Submodular Facility Location
    In the Submodular Facility Location problem (SFL) we are given a collection of n clients and m facilities in a metric space. A feasible solution consists of an assignment of each client to some facility. …

  • Oct. 17, 2024, 12:15 p.m.
    Krzysztof Rogowski (University of Warsaw)
    Strategy proof location mechanisms on graphs with a cycle
    The facility location problem involves selecting an optimal point on a graph to serve a group of agents, who may act strategically by misreporting their preferences to maximize their individual utility. This behavior motivates the …

  • Oct. 3, 2024, noon
    Georgios Papasotiropoulos (University of Warsaw)
    As Time Goes By: Adding a Temporal Dimension Towards Resolving Delegations in Liquid Democracy

  • May 16, 2024, 12:45 p.m.
    Łukasz Janeczko (AGH University of Science and Technology)
    Discovering Consistent Subelections (Discovering Consistent Subelections)
    We show how hidden interesting subelections can be discovered in ordinal elections. An interesting subelection consists of a reasonably large set of voters and a reasonably large set of candidates such that the former have …

  • May 16, 2024, noon
    Grzegorz Pierczyński (AGH University of Science and Technology)
    Single-Winner Voting with Alliances: Avoiding the Spoiler Effect
    We study the setting of single-winner elections with ordinal preferences where candidates might be members of alliances (which may correspond to e.g., political parties, factions, or coalitions). However, we do not assume that candidates from …